|
HOME OF "PICTURES OF A STOCK
MARKET MANIA"
|
February 1, 2012
Alan M. Newman's Stock Market
CROSSCURRENTS
Alan M. Newman, Editor
Excerpts from our special Year Ahead issue
The Melt Up
Stocks have received great press so far this year,
all 30 days of it. Amazing. Everywhere we turn, we see reports
about the “melt up,” as Wall Street and the media attempt to coerce bystanders
back in the waters. Muddy waters, we might add. Stocks are
allegedly undervalued, yet Tobin’s Q says precisely the opposite.
Initial unemployment claims are falling, but continuing claims are rising,
and quite rapidly at that. For every positive aspect cited, we see
at least one highly significant negative. Okay, okay, we admit it.
The Dow’s 3.6% rise so far in January is pretty good. However, we’d
also like to note that gold bullion has soared 11.3% in the same span.
If stocks are in a melt up, what can we say about gold? In our Year
Ahead issue headline for 2011, we claimed “Gold may just go parabolic.”
We were not too far from wrong as bullion surged by more than 27% in less
than eight months.
It’s comical to see just how intent the media is
to pander to any bull case, in the effort to outdo Job of biblical fame.
Just give us a name, or two, or better yet four. Thus, even a bear
who believe stocks will collapse 35% in 2012 can be persuaded to provide
ammunition for struggling investors who need a fix (see http://yhoo.it/w40hOL).
We believe there are significant odds for the situation in Europe to achieve
a flashpoint in only six to seven weeks. We see very small odds for
positive news, with a best case likely to be a further stall as debt continues
to build. See the slideshow at http://bit.ly/xIZ7OW
for a primer. And by the way, that should be very good news for gold.
Best Case, Time Out
Traditionally, February is quite the lackluster
month, up just over 51% of the time all the way back to 1900, a kind of
a “they threw a party but no one came” type of month. Fact is, the
party starts much earlier, after the typical autumn bottom. By the
time we get to November, the party heats up a lot. Novembers are
up close to 62% of the time, Decembers are up over 73% of the time and
Januarys are up nearly 64% of the time. Thus, February is excused
as a time in which the revelers need to catch their breath and take a nap
before the fun can resume.
We expect no different from this year’s second
month. February in election years going back to 1952 has not been
particularly volatile, no matter what the chart appears to suggest, but
given where we are coming from, if volatility returns, we expect downside
volatility. Since 1981, February has been the third worst performing
month for the S&P 500 with total returns (including dividends) of 0.21%.
Not much to crow about. At best, looks to be a time out. At
worst, it is now time for a correction.
The Laughter Index
There have been a few incredibly interesting revelations
over the few weeks, one of which was about the correlation of laughter
at Federal Open Market committee) FOMC meetings to the housing peak, a
circumstance aided and abetted by the FRB Chairman’s open embrace of all
derivative products. To show how truly demented our leadership was,
at one point Treasure Secretary Timothy Geithner turned to Alan Greenspan
(the soon-to-be retired Chairman of the FRB and said, "I’d like the record
to show that I think you’re pretty terrific, too. [Laughter]
And thinking in terms of probabilities, I think the risk that we decide
in the future that you’re even better than we think is higher than the
alternative." [Laughter] Yes, the transcripts noted laughter
in the room. We thank The Daily Stag Hunt (http://bit.ly/yZtxiQ)
for giving us this amusing but depressingly insightful perspective about
how poorly our country's economy was (and presently still is) mismanaged
by those at the FOMC. Was it pure coincidence that the frequency
of laughter at FOMC meetings rose in tandem with the housing market and
peaked at the same time as the Case-Shiller Home Price Index? We
think not. It was a matter of hubris and foolish confidence in the
ability of the system to leverage itself to levels never seen before in
history. Visit the link if only to view the amazing chart showing
how the monthly average of laughter went from 16.5 in 2000 to 43.8 in 2006
with a monthly high of 65 in October. As we see with the vast majority
of participants in every financial decision making arena, the common wisdom
is almost never wisdom at all, but precisely the opposite. This was
another case of the power of Groupthink. Groupthink dominated the
FOMC meetings and Sir Alan, as we pointed out so often, was completely
wrong about the potential negative effects of derivatives. While
minutes of the FOMC meetings are made available three weeks later, the
full transcripts are kept secret for five full years for some arcane and
unfathomable reason. Thus, we can never know within a reasonable
period of time if the FOMC actually knows what it is doing. We
are not laughing.
Claims Are Up, Not Down
In recent months, the headlines have been quick
to point out that weekly initial unemployment claims have been dropping,
noting the cheerful possibility of a nascent turnaround in the economy.
Per usual, all you get to see is only a piece of the puzzle and a sound
bite designed to please because bad news really doesn’t sell well at all.
We have not presented our own charts in a while but today seems appropriate
if only to provide a slightly different perspective. Thus, instead
of highlighting initial claims versus continuing claims, we highlight continuing
claims versus continuing claims. We heartily admit that initial claims
are falling and of course, are cheering the decline but the current level
of continuing claims remains higher than any back to a very brief surge
that occurred in the late summer of 2005. As well, continuing claims
are once again rising and now represent over four million souls still on
the dole. Despite the decline in initial weekly claims, the number
of those remaining on the unemployment rolls has increased by 941,386 since
October 1st. That’s a 30% increase and is clearly not a good sign
for those touting a recovery in the economy.
INTERESTED IN PERSPECTIVES YOU'LL
FIND NOWHERE ELSE?
ENROLL IN OUR FREE TRIAL.
NO OBLIGATION.
WATCH THIS SPACE FOR MORE COMMENTARY
ON FEBRUARY 22nd.
WHY NOT REQUEST A FREE TRIAL?
Powerful
Commentary. Unique Perspectives.
ABOUT ALAN M. NEWMAN
Alan M. Newman has been the Editor of CROSSCURRENTS
since the first issue was published in May of 1990. Mr. Newman is also
a member of the Market Technician's Association
and has been widely quoted for years by the financial press, media, and
other newsletters and has written articles for BARRON'S.
The newsletter is published roughly every three weeks and focuses on economic and stock market commentary, often covering controversial
subjects. Several proprietary technical indicators are usually featured
in every issue accompanied by current interpretation. Broad samples
of our work can be viewed at http://www.cross-currents.net/.
Subscription rates are now $189 for one year and $100 for six months. A FREE 3 issue trial subscription is available by emailing us (click the "free trial" link above). Please note: trial requests must include name, address and phone number and must originate from the email address the trial is to be delivered. Trials are only available by Email (.pdf files). U.S. Mail subscriptions are available but include a nominal surcharge for postage
and handling.
|