|
Click here http://www.streetsmartreport.com
for more Street Smart Commentaries.
BEING
STREET SMART
By Sy Harding
WHO
IS REALLY PAYING FOR THE RESCUE EFFORTS? November 28, 2008.
Newspapers
and Internet chat-rooms are full of witty comments regarding the costly
government bailout and stimulus efforts.
"Where's
my bailout?" "Hey, I've
incorporated my piggy bank. Now I'm a failing bank, and I want my share of the
bailout money."
But
the most seriously intended complaints are that ordinary tax-payers, the little
guys, are bailing out the wealthy bankers. So the wealthy and their big
financial institutions will survive, while as a result of their greed, the
economy will suffer a bad recession and the little guy is not only stuck with
paying the bill for the rescue efforts, but may well lose his house or his job,
or both.
Well,
there's no doubt about it. Taxpayers, not only of this generation, but of the
next generation, will be paying off the debt the government is incurring to save
the banking system and re-stimulate the economy.
But
who are those tax-payers? Are they not the very wealthy, while the main
beneficiaries of the rescue efforts will be the middle class and even more so
those at the bottom of the economic ladder? Interesting questions.
The
U.S. tax code is a so-called progressive system, calling for those who have the
highest income to provide most of the taxes the government collects, not only
because they have the highest income, but also because they pay a much higher
percentage of that income.
As
a result, the top 1% of taxpayers by income pay roughly 36% of all income taxes
paid. The top 5% of taxpayers pay 57% of all taxes paid. The top 10% pay 68% of
all taxes paid.
So
the small group of the wealthiest 5% of taxpayers will pay more than half of the
taxpayers' cost of the rescue efforts.
Stepping
down from the top 5% echelon, taxpayers who rank in the top half of taxpayers by
income, pay virtually all individual income taxes collected. Taxpayers in this
group pay 97% of all income taxes.
That
leaves half of taxpayers paying just 3% of the total, to say nothing of the many
workers who pay no income taxes at all.
Even
that is only part of the equation. Individual income taxes account for only
about 40% of the government's tax revenue. Payroll taxes paid by corporations,
corporate income taxes, and estate and gift taxes, account for most of the rest,
and that also tends to come mostly from the very wealthy. So half of taxpayers
pay what, maybe 1% of the country's total tax revenues?
Yet,
which half of taxpayers would suffer the most if the financial system and the
economy were not rescued, and the country fell into a repeat of the Great
Depression of the 1930's?
Well,
it wouldn't be the very wealthy. They might have to cut back from four or five
fabulous homes to only three or four. They might drive less ostentatious cars,
leaving the Bentley and Ferrari in the garage, if only to appear less
extravagant when driving past soup kitchens and unemployment lines. But they
wouldn't be eating at those soup kitchens, or suffering from loss of
employment income.
Yes,
the little guy and the middle class are suffering from the recession, and homes
and jobs are being lost. And the hard times were caused by the previous greed
and outlandish risk-taking of financial firms, the failure of the regulators to
regulate, but as well by the carelessness of consumers in buying homes they
couldn't afford, and taking the equity out of homes they did own in order to
buy second homes, large screen TVs, and SUV's.
But
the dollar cost of the rescue efforts will be paid by the wealthy and
corporations, while ordinary consumers and taxpayers will benefit the most, or
at least suffer far less damage, if the rescue effort succeeds (which it will).
There
are obviously many who would rather see banks, General Motors, and any other
employer suffering from current economic problems caused by their previous poor
governance, go under. There might be some short-lived satisfaction in that, as
in seeing them pay for their sins.
But
just maybe they should consider who is paying the major costs of the bailout
efforts, and whether they and their families should even be grateful for that,
considering who would suffer the most if the bailout efforts fail.
With
the unemployment rate still only 6%, many who have not had family members lose
jobs, who are feeling confident enough now to not care if major banks and
corporations go under, would not be so confident in another Great Depression.
The unemployment rate in the 1930's Depression reached 24.9%. Almost one in
every four workers was unemployed, with previously well-paid white-collar
workers and executives well represented in those ranks.
Sy
Harding is president of Asset Management Research Corp, DeLand, FL, publisher of
the website www.StreetSmartReport.com,
and the free daily www.SyHardingblog.com.
Sy authored the timely 1999 book, Riding
the Bear - How to Prosper in the Coming Bear Market! His latest book is Beat
the Market the Easy Way - Surprising Seasonal Patterns Double the Market's
Performance!
Harding
is frequently ranked in Timer-Digest's Top-Ten Market-Timers in the U.S.
|